e have been attempts to explain these taboos in terms ofinappropriate social relationships either between those who areinvolved and those who are not simultaneously involved in thesatisfaction of a bodily need，or between those already satiatedand those who appear to be shamelessly gorging.
人们试图对这些禁忌作出解释，所依据的要么是那些正置身于某一身体需要满足的人与那些并置身于某一身体需要之满足的人之间的，要么是那些早已酒足饭饱的人与那些正在不知羞耻地狼吞虎咽失之间的不相称的社会关系。
critics of Family Brontes novel Wuthering Heights see itssecond part as a counterpoint that comments on，if it does notreverse，the first part，where a romantic reading receives moreconfirmation.
研究艾米丽勃朗特小说《呼啸山庄》的`许多文学评论家，将小说的第二部分视作一种对比物，即使没有将第一部分予以逆转的话，也是在对第一部分作出一种诠释评判，而在小说第一部分中，一种浪漫的的读解能获得更为充分的确证。
ted that the presence of these elements need not arguean authorial awareness of novelistic construction comparable to that ofHenry James，their presence does encourage attempts to unify thenovels heterogeneous parts.
诚然，这些因素的存在并不能证明作者对小说架构的意识可与亨利詹姆斯的那种意识相比拟;然则，任何力图将小说所有形形色色的因素统一起来的做法，在某种程度上注定是无法令人信服的。