众多研究生院和商学院要求申请者提交GRE考试成绩，借此评估申请者的潜质，预测他们将来在学业中的表现。下面请看GRE写作经验分享，帮助你留学成功。
1. 对于时间充裕的同学
机经中的高频是出现频率高的作文,没有人能保证考时一定遇到高频题. 如果还有不少时间,建议不要放弃任何一道题, 很多经验证明了，很多考生都有可能遇到有史以来第一次考到的ISSUE和ARGU题, 所以什么事情都是有可能发生的(就好象指出ARGU里的逻辑错误一样)
2. 对于时间不那么充裕的同学
如何利用GRE作文机经准备ISSUE。建议准备出现频率最高的40道ISSUE,注意这里指的频率指的是近两年的总频率,不分时间地域,同时加上本月本地出现3次以上的ISSUE题(大部分已经包括在前40道里,因此需要另外准备的不多).
拿我个人来说,我在北京考,考前准备了总频超过30次的38道ISSUE(3.8机经的数据,现在可能有更新)+5至6道北京3月出现3次以上同时未包括在这38道中的题,考试时遇到的两道 177,141分别出现39,38次,均为高频。
就我考前从各种渠道了解的信息，绝大部分人考时遇到一道频数大于30的可能性是相当大的。(也许有人会说很多人并没有来报机经，我的数据不一定可靠。这个就见仁见智了，我只是表达个人的建议，采纳与否，全是个人的自由.但无疑当考前时间不够时,准备出现机率较大的题目显然是特殊情况下的最佳选择了)
如何利用GRE作文机经准备ARGU。重要的是多熟悉题目,时间充裕的应该做到任何一道题都没有不认识的单词,不理解的语句,这样找错才能有的放矢.
时间不够的,至少把考过10次以上的题目(约90多道) 加上本月本地出现过但未列入上述90多道的题目全过一遍,弄懂每一个单词.这很重要,否则考场上碰到关键单词不认识,加上紧张,可就傻眼了.拿我来说,考时遇到的是10几频的题,幸好考前晚上刚过了一遍,否则文中有两个单词都不认识,显然会很不爽.
阅读延伸：
优秀范文：
题目：
Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.
I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop proGREssing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.